Emergency Medicine Decision rule Strong evidence Clinical review pending v1.0.0

NEXUS Criteria for C-Spine Imaging

Can cervical spine imaging be safely avoided after blunt trauma?

Add to favourites

Calculator

Fields marked * are required. Units can be changed per field.

Reset

Result

Your result will appear here

Complete the inputs and select Calculate. Results update instantly for point scores.

About this tool

Five low-risk criteria; if all are absent, cervical spine imaging is not indicated.

Intended use

Patients with blunt trauma and possible cervical spine injury.

Outcome

Clinically significant cervical spine injury

Time horizon

Index visit

Derivation population

21 US emergency departments.

Limitations

  • 'Distracting injury' and 'intoxication' are subjective.
  • Lower sensitivity reported in older adults.

Clinical problems

Evidence

Evidence level

Strong evidence

Derived and externally validated in multiple cohorts (including prospective studies) and incorporated into major clinical guidelines. Methodology

Validation studies

NEXUS prospective validation (Hoffman 2000)
34,069 patientsProspective

Sensitivity 99.6%, specificity 12.9%, NPV 99.9% for clinically significant injury.

Evidence summaries for this tool are awaiting independent clinical review. Statistics are shown only where they could be attributed to a specific publication.

References

  1. Original publicationHoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 2000;343:94-99. Find on PubMed (opens in a new tab)

Version history

VersionFormulaEffectiveReviewerChanges
v1.0.0Hoffman 20002026-10-03—Initial implementation with reference test vectors.

Compare with alternatives

Related tools

Clinical decision support only. Interpret results in the context of the individual patient and current guidance; HumanPulse does not replace professional medical judgment.