Emergency Medicine Decision rule Strong evidence Clinical review pending v1.0.0

Canadian C-Spine Rule

Does an alert, stable trauma patient need cervical spine imaging?

Add to favourites

Calculator

Fields marked * are required. Units can be changed per field.

Applicability

1 · High-risk factors (mandate imaging)

2 · Low-risk factors (allow safe range-of-motion assessment)

3 · Range of motion

Able to actively rotate neck 45° left and right?optional Assess only if a low-risk factor allows safe assessment of range of motion.
Reset

Result

Your result will appear here

Complete the inputs and select Calculate. Results update instantly for point scores.

About this tool

Three-step decision rule (high-risk factors, low-risk factors, active neck rotation) for cervical spine imaging.

Intended use

Alert (GCS 15) and stable adult trauma patients with possible cervical spine injury.

Outcome

Clinically important cervical spine injury

Time horizon

Index visit

Derivation population

Canadian emergency departments.

Do not use in

Age < 16, GCS < 15, unstable vitals, acute paralysis, known vertebral disease, previous C-spine surgery.

Limitations

  • Requires an alert, cooperative patient.
  • Not derived in children.

Clinical problems

Evidence

Evidence level

Strong evidence

Derived and externally validated in multiple cohorts (including prospective studies) and incorporated into major clinical guidelines. Methodology

Validation studies

Derivation (Stiell 2001)
8,924 patientsProspective

100% sensitivity and 42.5% specificity for clinically important cervical spine injury.

Evidence summaries for this tool are awaiting independent clinical review. Statistics are shown only where they could be attributed to a specific publication.

References

  1. Original publicationStiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:1841-1848. Find on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
  2. Validation studyStiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2510-2518. Find on PubMed (opens in a new tab)

Version history

VersionFormulaEffectiveReviewerChanges
v1.0.0Stiell 20012026-10-03—Initial implementation with reference test vectors.

Compare with alternatives

Related tools

Clinical decision support only. Interpret results in the context of the individual patient and current guidance; HumanPulse does not replace professional medical judgment.